*This post was originally written in 2017 and updated for content in 2024
Last week I worked on a commercial shoot with an agency from New York and my friend, the lead producer for the project, is a woman. The scope of the production was large and quickly I noticed that almost all the producers (more than three of us, working around the clock) were women. Meanwhile, the more creative positions such as director, creative designer and cinematographer were filled by men. Just by looking at the names popping in my inbox, I could accurately tell if an e-mail was going to be about logistics/admin or creative/technical issues.
Coincidentally, when I was translating my mother’s resume, a Venezuelan woman who worked as an executive in a large, powerful company for thirty years, I found that as part of the heading, she had listed very personal information such as her civil status, her age, and the fact that she had a son and a daughter who are financially and socially independent. I was pleased to delete all that, assuring her that in the United States, providing those details is unecessary but soon I ran into other information that I couldn’t delete and not only reflected realities in the corporate world in Venezuela, but also applied to the film industry today. Despite her training, honors, and awards, her professional path was destined to involve administrative work from the beginning. My mother’s list of achievements were limited to project management positions and assistant work for vice-presidents of organizations that often had less experience and academic training than she did.
It is nothing new to say that the film industry is dominated by males but even other industries that are considered more “fair” in terms of gender balance often focus on having enough women employees instead of considering the kinds of positions that are being filled by them. Are too many of us women in the professional arena modern secretaries? Was women’s reputation of being good managers born in a conference room full of men who didn’t want to track projects or worry about deadlines anymore? At least in the film industry, a person can go from being an office production assistant, to a coordinator, to a manager and eventually become a producer, much faster that you can climb any other ladder that will eventually allow you to lead a more creative department. This was at least my experience and it has been the experience of many of my friends who are women working for big studios and small production houses alike. This article about gender ambition by the BCG does a good job at exploring how companies can create a path towards leadership that is equally inclusive of men and women.
When I read a line in my mother’s resume saying that she enjoys “processes and administrative work” I wondered what exactly a woman with an academic record in innovation, research and technology, finds so enjoyable about administrative tasks. Maybe the paycheck. I enjoy the paycheck too but what is different between her situation working in Venezuela as an engineer in the 1990s and the situation of a filmmaker in the United States today that is never on set? I look at brilliant, successful filmmakers that, despite their achievements, are still not getting the directing gigs they bid for. Too often, it is hard to find what differentiates them from the men getting the jobs, aside from their gender.
This discrepancy holds true in different areas of the filmmaking industry. Even in reputable studios like Pixar Animation Studios, a place based in northern California and heavily influenced by timely discussions of gender equality and representation, you will find a predominant presence of talented women with solid credentials filling assistant roles, roles that by industry standards should lead to creative positions but admittedly become lifelong careers, dominated by booking travel and keeping track of their bosses’ busy schedules. This distinct division of roles is even more obvious when you step into a set and find yourself surrounded by men in the lighting department talking about using a 'skirt' (using duvetyne to control light sources) grabbing a 'butt plug' (a 2k to 750 adapter), asking for someone to 'run a whip out to me' (meaning, they need an extension cord), or someone yelling out 'I need a Broad strung up between the two Blondes!' (referring to a broad lens dispersing yellowish light). This kind of language on a set is the equivalent of having mostly male co-workers doing push-up competitions in the office as a way to connect with one another and unconsciously, alienate women.
I am not bashing on the many talented men I have had the pleasure to work with or on the many women that are incredible producers and love their work. Rather, I want to hold us all accountable for minding the gap. Women should be involved in all the aspects of filmmaking that interests them with the confidence that there is a path for them that leads to creative positions, if that's what interests them. I also think that men could be more aware of the impact of their dominating so that, past the politics, we can continue to work towards a truly balanced work place.
Comments